top of page
South Carolina Undergraduate Law Journal

Blog Posts


Innovation at Risk: AI Banking Regulation Must Not Leave Community Banks Behind
Writer: Somers Kirk Editors: Andrew Lehnhardt, Steven Carredano Mendez Abstract This blog argues that federal AI banking regulations should protect consumers without imposing uniform compliance burdens on community banks and credit unions. While existing laws such as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and fair lending rules already address some risks, AI creates new gaps involving data inference, vendor oversight, and institutional capacity. Rather than adopting a sweeping federal
Jul 296 min read


Citizens United Is Not the Problem - Civic Engagement is
Writer: Elijah Butcher Editors: Meghan Kane, Kate Murphy, Steven Carredano Mendez I. Introduction Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission1 is one of the more controversial Supreme Court decisions in recent memory due to its striking down of limits on corporate spending in elections. The Court held that the government may not restrict independent expenditures by corporations and unions that support or oppose candidates in elections, overturning Austin v. Michigan Chamb
Jul 157 min read


Time for a Change? An analysis on the growing need for long-overdue SCOTUS reforms
Writer: Lily Kurtz Editors: Kaleigh Erler, Andrew Lehnhardt I. Introduction There is a growing issue with polarization on a number of issues in the United States, some of the most notable include debates on birthright citizenship, voting rights, and presidential authority, which are all being contested in the Supreme Court. Throughout American history the government has expanded executive powers and resized the legislature, yet little reform has touched the Supreme Court. In
Jun 306 min read


The Supreme Court’s Problem with “Leaving it to the State”
Writer: Joseph Pilcher Editors: Kate Murphy, Bryce Presley, Steven Carredano Mendez I. Introduction The Supreme Court of the United States was designed to be the final arbiter of constitutional questions, responsible for acting on state laws and human rights. Yet throughout American history, the Court has, at critical moments, deferred this responsibility to the tumultuous terrain of state politics. This pattern is known as judicial abdication or deference, which is meant to
May 2814 min read
bottom of page